From Library Journal
Seldom given as much attention as they deserve, the archetypal Ohioan Anderson's last 16 years in and around Virginia are the focus of this helpfully introduced and unobtrusively annotated selection of essays. These unfamiliar works were written by Anderson as editor of two weekly newspapers (one Democrat, the other Republican) that he bought in Marion, Virginia, in 1927. Editors Taylor (English, Univ. of Richmond) and Modlin (English, Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ.) have organized these 38 essays under the five thematic categories Discovering the South, The Southern Highlands, A Country Editor, Southern Labor, and A New South. Always the pilgrim and questioner, always on the side of the underdog, Anderson found in his adopted homeland a still largely agrarian society of rugged individuals that was beginning to suffer the dislocations caused by industrialization. These essays, all vintage Anderson in style and tone, help explain the last phase of a seminal American literary career. Recommended for all libraries.?Charles Crawford Nash, Cottey Coll., Nevada, Mo.Copyright 1997 Reed Business Information, Inc.

From Kirkus Reviews
Anderson's writing on the South (where he lived late in his life), much of it obscure or previously unpublished, illuminates the writer more than the region. The selected fiction, essays, memoirs, and journalism, edited by Taylor (English/Univ. of Richmond) and Modlin (English/Virginia Polytechnic Inst.), offer insight into the artistic modus operandi of the author of Winesburg, Ohio and showcase the native Midwesterner's distrust of intellectualism. In ``How I Ran a Small-Town Newspaper,'' Anderson offers a prescription for journalism that represents a fair summation of his fictional technique: ``We . . . have too much the inclination toward what I think of as `big thinking' when what we really want and need is more color, more interest taken in just our own daily lives.'' Anderson practiced a uniquely lighthearted, creative brand of small-town journalism (inventing a fictional staff of reporters, including the famous Buck Fever) while challenging such hallowed southern givens as the purity of white womanhood and the opposition to all things northern. He himself engaged the big issues of the day--industrialization, unionization, and Depression hardship- -infrequently and only so far as they affected the daily lives of workers. The bulk of the material consists of humorous sketches and newspaper and magazine articles that are more impressionistic than objective. Anderson alternately romanticized the South (waxing lyrical about the dignity of poor whites and blacks, the beauty of southern nights) and defended the little folks--mill workers, tobacco farmers, hill people--he thought exploited by big business. Still, his outlook is basically optimistic, his approach evenhanded. As moderator of the famous 1930 debate between John Crowe Ransom (leader of the Agrarian movement) and Stringfellow Barr (a Virginia Quarterly editor who advocated industrialism), Anderson tellingly characterized himself as ``a little worm . . . in the fair apple of progress.'' A notable, if uneven, addition to the Anderson legacy. -- Copyright ©1997, Kirkus Associates, LP. All rights reserved.

Card catalog description
Southern Odyssey contains the best of Sherwood Anderson's writings about the region where he spent the last sixteen years of his life. In more than forty selections of journalism and fiction, Anderson explores the people and problems of the South.

FROM THE PUBLISHER

Southern Odyssey contains the best of Sherwood Anderson's writings about the region where he spent the last sixteen years of his life. In more than forty selections of journalism and fiction, Anderson explores the people and problems of the South.

FROM THE CRITICS

Library Journal

Seldom given as much attention as they deserve, the archetypal Ohioan Anderson's last 16 years in and around Virginia are the focus of this helpfully introduced and unobtrusively annotated selection of essays. These unfamiliar works were written by Anderson as editor of two weekly newspapers (one Democrat, the other Republican) that he bought in Marion, Virginia, in 1927. Editors Taylor (English, Univ. of Richmond) and Modlin (English, Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ.) have organized these 38 essays under the five thematic categories Discovering the South, The Southern Highlands, A Country Editor, Southern Labor, and A New South. Always the pilgrim and questioner, always on the side of the underdog, Anderson found in his adopted homeland a still largely agrarian society of rugged individuals that was beginning to suffer the dislocations caused by industrialization. These essays, all vintage Anderson in style and tone, help explain the last phase of a seminal American literary career. Recommended for all libraries.Charles Crawford Nash, Cottey Coll., Nevada, Mo.

Kirkus Reviews

Anderson's writing on the South (where he lived late in his life), much of it obscure or previously unpublished, illuminates the writer more than the region.

The selected fiction, essays, memoirs, and journalism, edited by Taylor (English/Univ. of Richmond) and Modlin (English/Virginia Polytechnic Inst.), offer insight into the artistic modus operandi of the author of Winesburg, Ohio and showcase the native Midwesterner's distrust of intellectualism. In "How I Ran a Small-Town Newspaper," Anderson offers a prescription for journalism that represents a fair summation of his fictional technique: "We . . . have too much the inclination toward what I think of as `big thinking' when what we really want and need is more color, more interest taken in just our own daily lives." Anderson practiced a uniquely lighthearted, creative brand of small-town journalism (inventing a fictional staff of reporters, including the famous Buck Fever) while challenging such hallowed southern givens as the purity of white womanhood and the opposition to all things northern. He himself engaged the big issues of the day—industrialization, unionization, and Depression hardship—infrequently and only so far as they affected the daily lives of workers. The bulk of the material consists of humorous sketches and newspaper and magazine articles that are more impressionistic than objective. Anderson alternately romanticized the South (waxing lyrical about the dignity of poor whites and blacks, the beauty of southern nights) and defended the little folks—mill workers, tobacco farmers, hill people—he thought exploited by big business. Still, his outlook is basically optimistic, his approach evenhanded. As moderator of the famous 1930 debate between John Crowe Ransom (leader of the Agrarian movement) and Stringfellow Barr (a Virginia Quarterly editor who advocated industrialism), Anderson tellingly characterized himself as "a little worm . . . in the fair apple of progress."

A notable, if uneven, addition to the Anderson legacy.